Cancers arising in the pelvis account for up to 18% of all cancers [1]. Radiation therapy (RT) has been utilized in the treatment of these cancers for more than 100 years [2]. Due to their anatomical location, the lower ureters, bladder and posterior urethra are exposed to radiation during treatment for pelvic cancers, giving rise to a variety of urinary adverse effects (AEs) [1]. Although serious complications occurred with early forms of RT, technological advancement in the delivery of RT has significantly reduced the AEs. Short-term AEs of RT are well described and generally well tolerated. Although the long-term urinary AEs of pelvic RT can be severe, they are thought to be rare; but long-term data are lacking [3].
We describe a case of an elderly woman who is a known case of carcinoma of the cervix with post Radical hysterectomy and post pelvic radiotherapy status presented with fever, pain abdomen, vomiting, obstipation, voiding difficulties with dysuria on admission, which was diagnosed as acute intestinal obstruction with post-radiation bladder necrosis with acute kidney injury (AKI). This case is a rare example of high-grade AEs which occurred 8 yrs after RT in a known case of carcinoma of the cervix.

A 54-year-old woman was referred to the emergency department with a chief complaint of pain in the abdomen from the past 5 days. History of fever with multiple episodes of vomiting, obstipation, burning micturition with decreased urine output since 3 days. The patient's history suggested that she is a known case of carcinoma of the cervix for which radical hysterectomy with 25 cycles of adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy was done 8 yrs back. History of Type II diabetes mellitus on insulin medication since 14 years. On presentation to the emergency department, she was conscious, oriented and was afebrile. Physical examination revealed pallor with no icterus/cyanosis/clubbing/lymphadenopathy. Blood pressure was 90/70 mm of Hg and pulse rate was 110/min. On abdominal examination, Abdomen was soft, tender, distended with absent bowel sounds. On DRE, the rectum was loaded with hard petty stool. Her blood investigations revealed haemoglobin of 7.8 gm/dl, TLC of 8600 cells/mm, serum urea of 128mg/dl, serum creatinine of 1.7 mg/dl, serum electrolytes Na- 139 meq/l, K- 4.8 meq/l, Cl- 98 meq/l. Abdominal ultrasound showed distended small bowel loops with a maximum diameter measuring 4 cms showing to and fro peristalsis with small partially distended bladder. X-ray of erect abdomen showed distended small bowel with multiple air-fluid levels s/o small bowel obstruction.
With a preemptive diagnosis of Small bowel obstruction, an exploratory laparotomy was done after stabilizing the patient with intravenous crystalloids and antibiotics. Intraoperative findings included dilated small bowel loops, dense adhesions between distal ileum and pelvic wall (Figure 1), 500 ml toxic intraperitoneal fluid with complete bladder necrosis along with the bladder mucosa and transmural necrosis. Adhesiolysis with excision of the necrosed bladder wall (Figure 2 and 3) with drainage of toxic fluid and thorough saline wash of peritoneal cavity was done. As both small bowel and large bowel were unhealthy for urinary conduit creation because of post-radiation adverse effects, bilateral ureterostomies were done for urinary diversion (Figure 4 and 5).
Postoperatively the patient was kept in the intensive care unit on synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation because of AKI with severe metabolic acidosis with respiratory distress with hypoxemia. The patient developed supraventricular tachycardia on POD3 which was managed with intravenous adenosine. Later the patient was extubated on POD5 with no respiratory distress. Over the next two days, her renal function tests (serum creatinine – 1.1 mg/dl, serum urea - 48 mg/dl) was normalized. The patient was discharged on POD 7 in a stable condition with bilateral ureterostomies in situ and after stoma care training (Figure 6). Histopathology of the necrosed bladder wall showed chronic radiation changes with fibrosis with no evidence of malignancy ( Figure 7).
Six months postoperatively, the Patient got readmitted and a transverse colon conduit (Figure 8) with bilateral ureteric reimplantation was done. On follow up, After one year patient is doing well with good stoma care with urine draining well through colostomy with improved quality of life. CECT abdomen showed good drainage of contrast into the sigmoid conduit with normal renal function ( Figure 9).

Radiation is an effective cancer treatment due to its direct and indirect interaction with living cells. The direct interaction induces immediate cell death by damaging DNA and/or tissue protein. The indirect interaction occurs by the formation of free radicals by ionizing radiation that interacts with enzymes leading to cell death [4]. These direct and indirect interactions lead to cellular injury by affecting division delay, reproductive failure and interphase arrest. All these consequences are more frequently encountered in rapidly dividing cells [5].
A retrospective study of 10,709 patients reported late urological complications in 133 patients (1.24%) after curative radiotherapy for gynecological malignancies, during an observation period of 22 years [6]. Bladder necrosis as a late complication of radiotherapy for cervical cancer has only been described thrice before [7]. Late urinary adverse effects (AEs) are usually graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) system, which grades AEs on a scale of 0-5. Grade 0 denotes no complications. Minor AEs like microscopic hematuria are labelled grade 1. Grade 2 AEs include moderate urinary frequency, generalized telangiectasia, or intermittent macroscopic hematuria. Grade 1 and 2 AEs are commonly managed with observation or medical therapy and have minimal impact on quality of life. Grade 3 and 4 AEs are considered severe. These are often managed with a procedure and have a significant impact on quality of life. Grade 3 AEs include severe frequency or dysuria, severe generalized telangiectasia (often with petechiae), frequent hematuria, or a reduction in bladder capacity to less than 150 cc. Severe hemorrhagic cystitis, reduction in bladder capacity to less than 100 cc, and necrosis are classified as grade 4. Our patient has grade 4 late urinary adverse effects as per the RTOG system. Any death resulting from late complications of radiation is considered grade 5 (Table 1).
While incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer in women aged 50 and older have been declining in recent years, rates have remained stable in women under 50, the latter group making up 59% of new diagnoses [8]. While RT and radical surgery are equivalent in stage IB to IIA disease, RT is integral to the treatment regimen for stages IIB and greater. Adjuvant RT in addition to surgery may also be indicated for patients with particular risk factors (e.g., high-grade tumour, lymphovascular space involvement, positive margins, multiple positive nodes). Optimal RT consists of EBRT and intracavitary high dose rate-BT for a combined dose of 80-90 Gy [7]. Overall, 53% of women receive RT within six months of diagnosis [10].
The posterior bladder and insertion point of the ureters lie directly anterior to the cervix, making these areas most susceptible to injury. The most common major urinary AEs (grade 3 or above) are ureteral stenosis, vesicovaginal fistula, and hematuria.11 The risk of developing major urinary AEs is greatest in the first three years following treatment (0.7% per year) but there remains a constant actuarial risk of 0.25% per year for at least 25 years [11], [12]. The delay between RT and AEs can be substantial; ureteral stricture has been observed 29 years after RT for cervical cancer, and spontaneous bladder rupture has been reported as late as 30 years after [13]. Risk of increasingly severe AEs following RT is significantly associated with larger doses of radiation and the number of treatments [11].

Radiation-induced injury of the urinary tract is a complex and debilitating complication and can lead to significant morbidity for the patient. This case is a rare example of high-grade AEs which occurred 8 yrs after RT in a known case of carcinoma of the cervix. An improved understanding of RT AEs in general and late AEs, in particular, should aid patient-provider discussions of the risks and benefits of their treatment options and highlight areas for future research into ways to minimize these unintended consequences of care. An astute Urologist must be vigilant in expecting, recognising and managing EBRT induced urological complications in patients with pelvic malignancies especially complete urinary bladder necrosis although it's a very rare case scenario. 

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere thanks to the patient who participated in the study.

Ethical policy

Approval was taken from institutional ethical committee. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients gave their informed consent for their participation.

Author contributions

Conception and design of study: Mallikarjuna Reddy ;
Acquisition of data: Karthikesh Omkaram, Ershad Hussain Galeti ;
Analysis and/or interpretation of data: Karthikesh Omkaram, Ershad Hussain Galeti, Vedamurthy Reddy;
Drafting the manuscript: Karthikesh Omkaram, Ershad Hussain Galeti, Vedamurthy Reddy, Bhanu Teja Reddy, Ayesha Galeti;
Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: Mallikarjuna Reddy, Vedamurthy Reddy.

Competing interests

No conflict of interest.

Funding

None.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication.

Ethical Approval

Approved by the institutional ethical and research committee.

1. Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. American Cancer Society; Atlanta: 2009.
2. Jonathan D, Tward JD, Christopher J, Anker CJ: Radiation Therapy and Skin Cancer. In Natanasabapathi G. Modern Practices in Radiation Therapy. InTeched 2012: 207-246.
3. Elliott SP, Jarosek SA, Virnig BA: Unpublished analysis of SEER public use file. 1992-2006.
4. Ballek NK, Gonzalez CM: Reconstruction of radiation-induced injuries of the lower urinary tract. Urol Clin North Am 2013, 40(3): 407-419.
5. Bolus NE: Basic review of radiation biology and terminology. J Nucl Med Technol 2001, 29(2): 67-73.
6. Maier U, Ehrenbock PM, Hofbauer J: Late urological complications and malignancies after curative radiotherapy for gynecological carcinomas: a retrospective analysis of 10,709 patients. J Urol 1997, 158: 814-817.
7. Hermans TJ, Delaere KP, Mens JW, Paffen ML: Blaasnecrose na radiotherapie voor cervixcarcinoom [Necrotic bladder following radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2012, 155(35): A4951.
8. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures 2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Society 2013.
9. Colombo N, Carinelli S, Colombo A, Marini C, Rollo D, Sessa C: Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2012, 23(Suppl 7): vii27-32.
10. Elliott SP, Jarosek SA, Virnig BA: Unpublished analysis of SEER public use file. 1992-2006.
11. Eifel PJ, Levenback C, Wharton JT, Oswald MJ: Time course and incidence of late complications in patients treated with radiation therapy for FIGO stage IB carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 32(5): 1289-1300.
12. Pötter R, Georg P, Dimopoulos JC, Grimm M, Berger D, Nesvacil N, Georg D, Schmid MP, Reinthaller A, Sturdza A, et al: Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011, 100(1): 116-123.
13. Nishimura T, Suzuki K, Iijima M, Nozue M, Imai M, Suzuki S, Sakahara H, Ohta N, Kasami M: Spontaneous rupture of bladder diverticulum after postoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a case report. Radiat Med 2000, 18(4): 261-265.

Cite this article: Omkaram K, Nalabolu MR, Galeti EH, Reddy V, Reddy BT, Galeti A: A Rare Case of Post Radiation Urinary Bladder Necrosis in a Patient with Carcinoma Cervix. Ann Urol Oncol 2021, 4(2): 56-61. https://doi.org/10.32948/ auo.2021.12.31